“An Organic Vessel With Rippling Effect”

Pausing for Creative Co-Reflection on Our Arts-Inspired Collaborative Self-Study Research Initiatives in Teacher Education
, , &
Collaborative Self-studyDialogueArts-inspired Self-studyPoetryRich PicturesTweets
We, three South African teacher educators from research-intensive institutions, have been active in collaborative arts-inspired self-study research for over a decade. We share a commitment to tackling pressing social issues, like HIV and AIDS, within and beyond our local context. This study asked, “What can we learn by mindfully pausing and purposefully co-reflecting on our arts-inspired collaborative self-study contributions?” Our data sources included: a) three selected published articles using arts-inspired methods as a collaborative self-study team; b) rich pictures we individually created in response to our research question; and c) voice notes explaining our drawings. Data analysis started with individually composing tweets, which provided material for poetic interpretation and dialogue. Using a new combination of creative data representation and analysis methods (rich pictures, voice notes, tweets, poetry, and dialogue) enabled us to retrace and re-envision our art-inspired collaborative self-study path. This organic, multilayered process taught us more about ourselves and our intentions as teacher educators and self-study researchers. Overall, this self-study shows how teacher educators can combine various modes to represent and re-envision our professional aspirations in creative material forms. “An Organic Vessel With Rippling Effect” reminds us that we can all be resourceful, adaptable vessels for change.

Context

For more than a decade, we, three South African teacher educators from research-intensive institutions, have been involved in collaborative arts-inspired self-study research (Samaras, 2010). We have worked with other colleagues and as a trio. Our locations in different disciplines within teacher education (Kathleen in teacher development, Linda in mathematics education, and Lungile in gender and curriculum studies) have enabled us to learn from each other’s expertise.

We have experienced diverse creative ways of learning about ourselves, our practice, and others during our self-study research explorations, raising new possibilities and perspectives (Cole & Knowles, 2008). As literary and visual arts-inspired self-study methods, we have used:

Our arts-inspired self-study projects are based on the theoretical foundations laid by luminaries in arts-based educational research, such as Barone and Eisner (2006), Cole and Knowles (2008), and Mitchell and Weber (1999). These scholars explain how and why integrating the arts with academic inquiry provides new avenues to understand concepts and allows for expressing ideas in ways traditional written texts might overlook. They emphasise the transformative potential of the arts for educational and social change. As Eisner (2002) clarified, “The arts provide a platform for seeing things in ways other than they are normally seen. In so doing, they help us wonder, ‘Why not?’” (p. 83).

With Eisner’s “Why not?” question in mind, our joint self-study research expeditions have taken us through various creative learning modalities outside of customary academic frameworks in our efforts to address pressing educational and social issues (Mitchell et al., 2020). We have experienced how presenting and publishing our arts-inspired work can create a “ripple effect” (Weber, 2014, p. 12) that involves and encourages others, serving as platforms for change (Mitchell et al., 2020).

Aims

The Castle Conference Call for 2023 (S-STEP, n.d.) encouraged self-study researchers to pause and reflect intentionally to integrate new learnings from the past, present, and future. Inspired by the call, we began this study by asking, “What can we learn by mindfully pausing and purposefully co-reflecting on our arts-inspired collaborative self-study contributions?” To respond, we selected three published articles in which arts-inspired methods served as conversation starters and approaches to data representation and analysis (Pithouse-Morgan et al., 2018; Van Laren et al., 2019; Van Laren et al., 2020). We used these texts as material for pausing to co-reflect. The texts were the foundation for a multilayered arts-inspired self-study process that evolved organically through collective decision-making at each stage.

The Three Selected Articles

Our first article (Pithouse-Morgan et al., 2018) explores how we revealed and confronted our emotional fears as advisors of graduate students using self-study research to make a difference in several South African higher education institutions. Together with three other colleagues, we asked, “How can we work collaboratively and creatively to learn to navigate emotional entanglements in supervising self-study research?” Against the backdrop of pervasive traumatic stress related to the history of oppression and conflict in South Africa, we focused on the effort required to understand and respond to complex emotional knowledge in supportive and resourceful ways (Collins, 2013; Jansen, 2009). While our study focused on self-study research supervision in South Africa, we were mindful that research supervision, in general, can be emotionally taxing (Strandler et al., 2014). This is especially true of self-study supervision because of the openness and vulnerability required (Pithouse-Morgan et al., 2015a).

In this first article, the self-study process began with the visual exegesis (critical explanation or interpretation) of a painting (Hamilton, 2005). We chose to work with an expressionist painting because expressionism offers subjective perspectives and elicits emotional responses (Gordon, 1966). We composed a poem to collectively represent our reactions to the visual exegesis (Langer & Furman, 2004). Our examination showed how, over time, arts-inspired self-study with trusted colleagues facilitated the unfolding of emotional complexities in a contained and responsive manner. Emotional containment entails creating conditions in which emotions are purposefully aired in a secure environment to increase capacity for action and change (James, 2011). Our self-study showed how collaborative learning that used creative entry points and elicited subjective responses in a safe environment facilitated a deeper understanding of emotional perplexities. We believe that this is critical to developing self-study supervision pedagogy in a personally and socially just manner.

Our other two selected articles addressed HIV and AIDS education integration in higher education curricula. Considering that 7.8 million people in South Africa are infected with HIV, the pandemic continues to be a significant social issue, and the stigma surrounding HIV and AIDS remains a major source of social injustice (Be in the KNOW, 2022). As teacher educators, we have a crucial role in supporting teachers in schools and higher education to openly and constructively address issues related to HIV and AIDS. As part of our social responsibility, we used arts-inspired methods to start discussions about HIV and AIDS education. In both articles, we drew on our shared interest in research and teaching strategies inspired by the performing, visual, and literary arts (Van Laren et al., 2019; Van Laren et al., 2020).

The first of these two articles focused on creating a readers’ theatre script. Readers’ theatre scriptwriting is a creative, analytical technique in which researchers create a dramatic script from edited excerpts of a research transcript (Donmoyer & Yennie-Donmoyer, 1995). We created a readers’ theatre script to reflect on our use of everyday objects for opening dialogues in an HIV and AIDS curriculum integration workshop. The workshop attendees included university educators and graduate students from various disciplines and departments at a neighbouring university (Van Laren et al., 2019). In this self-study, we asked, “What can we learn about workshopping HIV and AIDS curriculum integration research in higher education by collaboratively composing and reflecting on a readers’ theatre script?”

We chose responses from three workshop participants to illustrate the outcomes of the object activity when writing our script (Van Laren et al., 2019). As part of the consolidation, we discussed how we responded to the social responsibility mandate outlined in the Policy and Strategic Framework on HIV and AIDS for Higher Education through this work (Higher Education HIV/AIDS Programme, 2012). We recognised that writing the readers’ theatre script provided thought-provoking opportunities for us to interrogate and strengthen our professional learning. The script became a mirror in which we could see our progress in understanding the value of arts-inspired, participatory activities in higher education for containing and connecting professional learning, particularly in emotionally charged areas such as HIV and AIDS.

We wanted to build on our learning from creating a readers’ theatre script (Van Laren et al., 2019) for the subsequent article (Van Laren et al., 2020). Following the script’s completion, we asked five teacher-educator colleagues to read it aloud at a South African national education conference. The title of our presentation was “Containing HIV/AIDS: Composing a readers’ theatre script for relevant and authentic professional learning in higher education”. After the presentation, we asked, “What can we learn about imagining new ways of knowing for social change by staging a readers’ theatre script?” We then discussed how other educators reacted to possibly using such a tool to promote HIV and AIDS conversations. To reflect on the learning potential of using the script, we engaged with the script readers and the audience who attended the conference session. As poetic analysis, we composed a series of blank verse poems (Literary Devices, 2019). We concluded that staging a reader’s theatre script could aid educational and social change (Mitchell, 2008) by opening productive conversations about HIV and AIDS issues.

Our Creative Co-reflection Methods

Participants

As a collaborative team of self-study researchers, we were the participants in the creative co-reflection on our arts-inspired research initiatives. We were based in two South African provinces and worked from home due to COVID-19 restrictions. As a result, we did most of our work via email and a virtual group space on the WhatsApp message application.

Trustworthiness

We provided step-by-step details of the exploratory self-study research process to enhance trustworthiness (Feldman, 2003). We described our data sources and analysis and how our learning progressed. The characteristic of vigour in poetic research also influenced the design of our creative co-reflection (Faulkner, 2016). Considering vigour as a quality indicator motivated us to prioritise growth, vitality, and energy in our work.

Data Sources

The three selected published articles served as our primary data sources. The second set of data sources consisted of rich pictures (Campbell Williams, 1999) that we individually drew in response to our research question (Figures 1, 2, 3). Rich pictures are a visual brainstorming mode in which detailed images generate new perspectives on an issue or question (Checkland, 2000). Rich pictures were initially used in soft systems methodology (Checkland, 2000), but they have also been successfully used in collaborative self-study research (Pithouse-Morgan et al., 2016a; Samaras & Pithouse-Morgan, 2021). Kathleen had previously used rich images with other self-study collaborators, but this was the first time we created rich pictures as a team of three researchers.

We each drew a black-and-white image to represent our initial, personal response to the research question. After creating the pictures and sending photos of them to each other, we each shared a voice note describing our drawing via WhatsApp. The third set of data sources consisted of the transcripts of our three WhatsApp voice notes. Our rich pictures and lightly edited excerpts from the voice note descriptions are included below.

Figure 1

Kathleen’s Rich Picture: “Something Organic and Growing”

Kathleen: My rich picture is of growing leaves or a flower, which is quite beautiful because of its uniqueness. The uniqueness comes from our collaborative work’s different shapes, textures, and patterns. Those come from our life experiences and backgrounds, mixed with the various art-inspired forms we experiment with. I have filled in some of the leaves or petals. We have created those pieces together and individually, but there are still many leaves or petals waiting for our new adventures to be filled in.
Our individual capacities and experiences combine to create something that couldn’t be made alone, something living, dynamic, and organic. We do this experimenting because it’s fun, and we enjoy doing it together, but we also do it because there is a need for change, growth, and justice at the centre. It’s a deep sense that we, as teachers and teacher educators, parents and grandparents, are committed to working for a better world, particularly for young people. And we’ve seen a ripple effect when we’ve shared our work, which can offer people new ways of looking at things and fresh ideas.

Figure 2

Linda’s Rich Picture: “Not Merely Connecting the Dots”

Linda: I titled my annotated diagram “Not merely connecting the dots”. The jagged appearance of the diagram indicates the non-conventional arts-inspired methods we explored. I drew three concentric, irregular, concave polygons to represent our three articles.
The outermost polygon represents my experiences working with other self-study researchers in exploring the emotional entanglements in supervising self-study research. Our experiences were emotionally charged as we grappled with being “novice” supervisors of graduate self-study research students.
The next polygon represents my experiences in creating a readers’ theatre script to make public our learning about HIV and AIDS curriculum integration at a higher education workshop.
The innermost polygon depicts my learning experiences from staging our readers’ theatre script at a national conference.
The spongy central part of the diagram represents our prospective learning by co-reflecting on our experiences after publishing our three articles. As a team of researchers, we intended to bind, connect and extend our learning by pausing to facilitate and look forward to thought-provoking, shared, and novel self-study experiences.

Figure 3

Lungile’s Rich Picture: “Ice-Cream Cone”

Lungile: The ice cream cone made me think of our experiments with arts-inspired methods. These methods help us in receiving ideas and balancing our thoughts. They create a beautiful vessel to communicate various issues. We have written and spoken through them, and engaged in physical activities. The cone is the foundation where all these collaborative ideas are created. I look at the twirling of the ice cream; like it, we are going around in upward mobility, where each layer in the twirling keeps growing. Our first enjoyment is that tip, the first thing we bite into, and I think that is where our work is now.
People find enjoyment at that peak, and the more they dig into it, the more they realise its impact on the various issues we have tried to share with our diverse audiences in different ways. But I see it intertwining, and I see us in there because for that twirl to stay firm, it has to work together, and we have found our balance through our collaboration, where we are feeding off each other. Sometimes we have more than one form of arts-inspired method we are working with. Eventually, it comes together. I see our work as intertwined and twirling to create something we enjoy making and sharing.

Kathleen and Linda drew similar, whirled, concentric two-dimensional diagrams. Kathleen focused on ongoing aspects of growth related to professional learning, whereas Linda provided summaries and connections related to the three articles. Lungile also drew a whirled shape, representing a three-dimensional object to emphasise aspects of working together collaboratively.

Data Analysis

Step One: Tweets

We opted to make sense of the data in a dynamic, emergent process (St. Pierre & Jackson, 2014). As the first step in our analysis, we created tweets (posts on the social media application Twitter with a maximum of 280 characters) inspired by the voice notes describing our rich pictures. We frequently use tweets for data generation and analysis (Pithouse-Morgan et al., 2018; Pithouse-Morgan et al., 2016b) because the character limit and public Twitter forum encourage concise, clear communication. Composing the tweets necessitated sifting through our voice note transcriptions to discern what each of us saw as most relevant to our guiding research question:

Kathleen's Tweet. As teachers and teacher educators, we are committed to working for a better world, particularly for young people. We see the ripple effect of collaborative arts-inspired self-study methods and how they offer new ways of looking at things. And that matters; it makes a difference!
Linda's Tweet. As a team of self-study researchers, we balance, sustain and nurture organic growth of our professional learning. Arts-inspired methods facilitate our “making a difference” aims. We connect, extend and pursue purposeful yet unique, unpredictable and adventurous research journeys.
Lungile's Tweet. Beautiful vessel for connecting messages that is organic and growing with rippling effect. Art-inspired methods help bind, connect and extend our thought-provoking contributions. Collectively we pause to co-reflect on our powerful intertwining work for change, growth and justice.

Step Two: Found Poems

The tweets served as material for poetic analysis (Langer & Furman, 2004). For this step, we created a found poem (Butler-Kisber, 2005) by finding words and phrases in the three tweets that spoke to each other. We were inspired by the poetic format of the Renga, a Japanese form of linked-verse poetry traditionally created by two or more poets as a kind of conversation (Britannica, 2021). Kathleen proposed an adaptation of Renga in which different team members crafted certain parts of the poem using words and phrases from our set of tweets. We worked via email to create “An Organic Vessel with Rippling Effect” (Figure 4). Instead of focusing on writing a poem with literary merit, we emphasised the fun and spontaneity of thinking and communicating through poetry.

Figure 4

The Found Poem

An Organic Vessel With Rippling Effect

Self-study matters
In making a difference
For a better world


Inspired collaboration
Through intertwining learning

 
The arts provoking
New ways of looking, growing
With rippling effect

 
Our organic vessel aims
To connect, bind, and extend

Outcomes

Dialoguing With Each Other

The organic arts-inspired self-study process provided us with “new insights and also a deeper understanding of the original experience[s]” (Edge & Olan, 2021, p. 13) articulated in our three chosen articles. As Eisner (2002) explained, “our capacity to envision is transformed by the effort to represent what we have experienced” (p. 22). We were able to re-envision the purpose of our collaborative self-study research initiatives by expressing and representing our learning using multiple forms in a new combination (rich pictures, voice notes, tweets, and a poem).

We saw the poem as a compressed, metaphorical representation of our learning (Eisner, 2002). So, we stepped back to consider the poem as an artifact of “poetical thinking” (Freeman, 2017, p. 72) concerning our research question. This time, we asked, “What and how have we learned by mindfully pausing and purposefully co-reflecting on our three selected arts-inspired collaborative self-study contributions?” We each wrote a response, which we then emailed.

After that, using each stanza of the found poem as an organising device, we clustered resonant excerpts from our individual written reflections, emailing back and forth to create a poetic dialogue (Figure 5). Dialogue, a literary and performing arts-inspired genre, exemplifies how self-study researchers learn and grow through conversation (East et al., 2009). The dialogic responses to each stanza demonstrate how discussions with trusted peers can deepen and expand individual self-study researchers’ thoughts and ideas. The responses reveal various aspects of our personal yet resonant reactions to the research question.

Figure 5

The Poetic Dialogue

The Poetic Dialogue

Self-study matters
In making a difference
For a better world

Kathleen: Once again, we have gained new insights through arts-inspired self-study.

Linda: As self-study researchers who seek to make a difference by starting with ourselves, we have articulated our common purpose. We aim to confront sensitive social issues using generative means to work towards social change.

Lungile: This new arts-inspired work has allowed us to push further beyond methodological boundaries and join risk-takers who aim to communicate critical issues differently.

Inspired collaboration
Through intertwining learning

Kathleen: By asking questions in a collaborative setting, we learned more than we would have independently.

Linda: As self-study researchers from different professional disciplines, who voluntarily collaborate, we learned by connecting our ideas in exciting ways.  

The arts provoking
New ways of looking, growing
With rippling effect

Linda: The combination of arts-inspired forms we used provided many possible ways of expressing concepts. Furthermore, these forms can have many interpretations, allowing for rich, exciting ways of captivating attention or developing additional art forms for reflection and action.

Lungile: This self-study has inspired us to continue making meaning by observing, wondering, forming thoughts, and expressing.

Our organic vessel aims
To connect, bind, and extend

Kathleen: Connecting in an arts-inspired place with trusted others who share similar interests provided a sense of safety and encouragement for this new self-study venture.

Linda: As collaborative, dedicated self-study researchers who have worked together for several years, we combined our unique strengths to extend our arts-inspired methods. This can enable us to consider how we might improve our teaching and research practices.

Lungile: As collaborators, an essential new conversation has emerged in our pausing as we connect what we have done and see future explorations and possibilities. 

Dialoguing With Critical Friends

Mindful pausing is also about broadening our work by inviting others to comment on it to extend its trustworthiness (Mena & Russell, 2017; Schuck & Russell, 2005). Hence, to put the finishing touches to our self-study process, we asked four colleagues to join us in discussing what the found poem could communicate to extend our learning. These critical friends are academics from three South African universities with whom we have a long-standing collaboration on self-study research. They have extensive experience with arts-inspired research methods. We were confident that they would provide candid, insightful responses to help us advance our thinking beyond ourselves. This hour-long in-depth conversation featured many fascinating threads. What intrigued us most was the realisation of how collaborative, multilayered arts-inspired self-study can help us see the self as a changeable assemblage. Assemblage is a multidimensional art form created by combining disparate elements – often everyday objects – found by the artist or specifically acquired (TATE Art Terms, 2022).

The assemblage metaphor helped us understand why this work is meaningful to us and why it might be significant to others. Seeing ourselves as “assemblages, bricolages, cobblings, collages, conferences, patchworks” (Badley, 2022, p. 737) that are constantly enriched and expanded by the diversity of human lives and experiences fosters an optimistic awareness that meaningful change is always possible. We can live and act more resourcefully and imaginatively when we see that we are not fixed, unitary, or inflexible.

Scholarly Significance

We could re-see, re-hear, and re-live our art-inspired collaborative self-study experiences by consciously pausing to co-reflect using a new grouping of creative methods. The organic process enabled us to learn more about our partnership and shared intentions as teacher educators and self-study researchers. In pausing to reflect on our efforts over time, we saw how we grew and learned collectively and individually. We also appreciated how our arts-inspired self-study research efforts strengthened our commitment to a more compassionate and just society. Taking time out for creative reflection helped us understand more about how and why we wish to carry out our responsibility as teacher educators to address critical pedagogical and social issues.

This self-study has demonstrated how teacher educators can combine diverse modes to represent and re-envision our professional purposes in creative material forms (Eisner, 2002). Finding and using fresh metaphors to explain the reasoning behind our everyday actions can keep us moving forward in new directions (Bullough, 1994). We hope this research will inspire others to generate multilayered creative self-studies in which they can consciously pause and re-envision their past and future contributions. “An Organic Vessel With Rippling Effect” reminds us that we can all be resourceful, adaptable vessels for personal, educational, and social change.

References

Badley, G. F. (2022). Posthumous autoethnography? Qualitative Inquiry, 28(6), 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211066631

Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (2006). Arts-based educational research. In J.L. Green, G. Camilli, & P.B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 95-109). Routledge.

Be in the KNOW (2022). At a glance: HIV in South Africa, The biggest HIV epidemic in the world. https://www.beintheknow.org/understanding-hiv-epidemic/data/glance-hiv-south-africa

Britannica (2021). Renga. https://www.britannica.com/art/renga

Bullough Jr, R. V. (1994). Personal history and teaching metaphors: A self study of teaching as conversation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(1), 107-120.

Butler-Kisber, L. (2005). Inquiry through poetry: The genesis of self-study. In C. Mitchell, S. Weber, & K. O’Reilly-Scanlon (Eds.), Just who do we think we are? Methodologies for autobiography and self-study in teaching (pp. 95-110). RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464977_chapter_9

Campbell Williams, M. (1999). Rich pictures on the path towards systemic being. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(4), 369-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1743(199907/08)16:4%3c369::aid-sres247%3e3.0.co;2-h

Checkland, P. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(S1), S11–S58. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+%20<::AIDSRES374%20>%203.0.CO;2-O

Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2008). Arts-informed research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 55-70). Sage Publications.

Collins, A. (2013). Teaching sensitive topics: Transformative pedagogy in a violent society. Alternation Special Edition, 9(128 - 149). http://alternation.ukzn.ac.za/docs/20.6/07%20Col.pdf

Donmoyer, R., & Yennie-Donmoyer, J. (1995). Data as drama: Reflections on the use of readers theater as a mode of qualitative data display. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(4), 402-428. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/107780049500100403

East, K., Fitzgerald, L. M., & Heston, M. L. (2009). Talking teaching and learning: Using dialogue in self-study. In D. Tidwell, M. Heston, & L. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 55-72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_4

Edge, C. U., & Olan, E. L. (2021). Learning to breathe again: Found poems and critical friendship as methodological tools in self-study of teaching practices. Studying Teacher Education, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1910807

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.

Faulkner, S. L. (2016). The art of criteria: Ars criteria as demonstration of vigor in poetic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(8), 662-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416634739

Feldman, A. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 26-28.

Freeman, M. (2017). Modes of thinking for qualitative data analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315516851

Gordon, D. E. (1966). On the origin of the word ‘Expressionism’. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 29, 368-385.

Hamilton, M. L. (2005). Using pictures at an exhibition to explore my teaching practices. In C. Mitchell, S. Weber, & K. O’Reilly-Scanlon (Eds.), Just who do we think we are? Methodologies for autobiography and self-study in teaching (pp. 58-68). RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464977_chapter_6

Higher Education HIV/AIDS Programme (HEAIDS) (2012). Policy and strategic framework on HIV and AIDS for higher education. HEAIDS.

James, C. (2011). The importance of affective containment for teacher effectiveness and successful educational change. In C. Day & J. C.-K. Lee (Eds.), New understandings of teachers’ work: Emotions and educational change (pp. 119-134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0545-6_8

Jansen, J. D. (2009). Knowledge in the blood: Confronting race and the apartheid past. Juta and Company Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804771160

Langer, C., & Furman, R. (2004). Exploring identity and assimilation: Research and interpretive poems. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2), Article 5. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/609

Literary Devices (2019). Blank verse. https://literarydevices.net/blank-verse/

Masinga, L. (2014). Teachers learning about their sexual identities through collaborative storytelling: Mandla and Sihle’s story. Agenda, 28(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2014.872818

Masinga, L., Myende, P., Marais, A., Singh-Pillay, A., Kortjass, M., Chirikure, T., & Mweli, P. (2016). “Hear our voices”: A collective arts-based self-study of early-career academics on our learning and growth in a research-intensive university. Educational Research for Social Change, 5(2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2016/v5i2a8

Mena, J., & Russell, T. (2017). Collaboration, multiple methods, trustworthiness: Issues arising from the 2014 International Conference on Self-study of Teacher Education Practices. Studying Teacher Education, 13(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2017.1287694

Mitchell, C. (2008). Getting the picture and changing the picture: Visual methodologies and educational research in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v28n3a180

Mitchell, C., & Weber, S. (1999). Reinventing ourselves as teachers: Beyond nostalgia. Falmer Press.

Mitchell, C., Moletsane, R., MacEntee, K., & de Lange, N. (2020). Participatory visual methodologies in self-study for social justice teaching: A reflexive eye. In J. Kitchen, A. Berry, H. Guðjónsdóttir, S. M. Bullock, M. Taylor, & A. R. Crowe (Eds.), 2nd International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 683-712). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1710-1_23-1

Pithouse-Morgan, K., Coia, L., Taylor, M., & Samaras, A. P. (2016a). Exploring methodological inventiveness through collective artful self-study research. LEARNing Landscapes, 9(2), 443-460. https://www.learninglandscapes.ca/index.php/learnland/article/view/Exploring-Methodological-Inventiveness-Through-Collective-Artful-Self-Study-Research

Pithouse-Morgan, K., Khau, M., Masinga, L., & Van de Ruit, C. (2012). Letters to those who dare feel: Using reflective letter-writing to explore the emotionality of research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100104

Pithouse-Morgan, K., Masinga, L., Meyiwa, T., Naicker, I., Pillay, D., & Van Laren, L. (2018). Unfolding the “mysterious truth” of emotional entanglements in supervising self-study research: A collective arts-informed self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Pushing boundaries and crossing borders: Self-study as a means for researching pedagogy (pp. 83-90). Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices (S-STEP).

Pithouse-Morgan, K., Muthukrishna, N., Pillay, D., Van Laren, L., Chisanga, T., Meyiwa, T., Moletsane, R., Naicker, I., Singh, L., & Stuart, J. (2015a). Learning about co-flexivity in a transdisciplinary self-study research supervision community. In K. Pithouse-Morgan & A. P. Samaras (Eds.), Polyvocal professional learning through self-study research (pp. 145-171). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-220-2_9

Pithouse-Morgan, K., Naicker, I., Pillay, D., Masinga, L., & Hlao, T. (2016b). ‘Sink or swim?’: Learning from stories of becoming academics within a transforming university terrain. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.20853/30-1-561

Pithouse-Morgan, K., & Van Laren, L. (2015). Dialogic memory-work as a method to explore the “afterlife” of our self-study doctoral research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14, 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691501400108

Pithouse-Morgan, K., Van Laren, L., Mitchell, C., Mudaly, R., & Singh, S. (2015b). Digital animation for ‘going public’ on curriculum integration of HIV and AIDS in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(2), 237-259. https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/EJC176169

Samaras, A. P. (2010). Explorations in using arts-based self-study methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23(6), 719-736. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1080/09518390903426212

Samaras, A. P., & Pithouse-Morgan, K. (2021). Nourishing wholehearted faculty professional living through co-creative play. The educational forum, 85(3), 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2021.1912869

Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education: A Journal of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 1(2), 107-121.

Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices (S-STEP) (n.d.). Pausing at the threshold: Opportunity through, with, and for Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices. International Biennial Castle Conference 14 Conference Theme. https://www.castleconference.com/conference-theme.html

Strandler, O., Johansson, T., Wisker, G., & Claesson, S. (2014). Supervisor or counsellor? - Emotional boundary work in supervision. International Journal for Researcher Development, 5(2), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-03-2014-0002

St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715-719.

TATE Art Terms (2022). Assemblage. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/a/assemblage

Van Laren, L., Masinga, L., & Pithouse-Morgan, K. (2020). Envisaging new ways of knowing for social change: Poetic learning inspired by staging a readers’ theatre script. In C. Edge, A. Cameron-Standerford, & B. Bergh (Eds.), Textiles and Tapestries: Self-Study for Envisioning New Ways of Knowing (pp. 285-295). Equity Press. https://equitypress.org/textiles_tapestries_self_study/chapter_39

Van Laren, L., Pithouse-Morgan, K., Chisanga, T., Harrison, L., Meyiwa, T., Muthukrishna, N., Naicker, I., & Singh, L. (2014). ‘Walking our talk’: Exploring supervision of postgraduate self-study research through metaphor drawing. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(2), 639-659. https://doi.org/10.20853/28-2-346

Van Laren, L., Pithouse-Morgan, K., & Masinga, L. (2019). Containing HIV and AIDS: Creating a readers’ theatre script for professional learning in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 222‒240. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-3-2964

Van Laren, L., Pithouse-Morgan, K., Volks, C., & Alves, S. (2016). Scrapbooking as a tool for transdisciplinary professional learning about HIV and AIDS curriculum integration in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(4), 74-93. https://doi.org/10.20853/30-4-674

Weber, S. (2014). Arts-based self-study: Documenting the ripple effect. Perspectives in Education, 32(2), 8-20. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/article/view/1855

Kathleen Pithouse-Morgan

University of Nottingham

Linda van Laren

University of KwaZulu-Natal

Lungile Masinga

University of KwaZulu-Natal

This content is provided to you freely by Equity Press.

Access it online or download it at https://equitypress.org/pausing_at_the_thres/WUkHsTMo.